Women Property Inheritance: No Right for Daughters in Father’s Property? High Court Gives Historic Verdict on Inheritance Case!

Women Property Inheritance: In a landmark judgment concerning the rights of daughters in ancestral property, the Chhattisgarh High Court has delivered a significant verdict. The court has clearly ruled that daughters cannot inherit ancestral property if the succession opened before the year 1956. This ruling sets an important precedent for numerous long-pending cases related to property inheritance.

The court observed that before the implementation of the Hindu Succession Act in 1956, matters of inheritance in India were primarily governed by the Mitakshara Law. According to this traditional law, inheritance rights to ancestral property were granted exclusively to male heirs. Under this system, sons, grandsons, and great-grandsons became coparceners, or joint-heirs, in the ancestral property by birth.

Case Background and Lower Court Decisions

The specific case was based on a plea filed by a daughter. The petitioner’s father had passed away before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, came into effect, and he also had a son. As per the prevailing Mitakshara Law at that time, the presence of a male heir meant that the inheritance of the ancestral property passed solely to him.

Based on this legal principle, the lower courts had also dismissed the daughter’s claim. Subsequently, the daughter challenged this decision in the Chhattisgarh High Court. However, the High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts. In its verdict, the High Court reiterated that since the succession had opened before 1956, the law applicable at that specific time would govern the case.

Impact of Mitakshara Law and Significance of the Judgment

This judgment holds immense significance for all cases where the division of family property has been stuck in legal complexities for decades.

• Clear Interpretation of Law: The court has reaffirmed that the 1956 Act cannot be applied retrospectively to successions that occurred before its enactment.
• Primacy of Male Heirs: Under the Mitakshara Law, if a male heir (such as a son) was present, daughters could not claim any right in the ancestral property.
• The Crucial Date of Succession: The time of the property owner’s death is the critical factor that determines which law is applicable to a particular inheritance case.

Therefore, this ruling by the Chhattisgarh High Court provides a clear picture of the old laws and their application. It confirms that for successions that opened before 1956, the prevailing social and legal norms of that era will be followed, and daughters will not be entitled to the property if a male heir exists. This decision is likely to influence similar pending cases in various courts across the country.