Primary 32000 Case: Are the Petitioners in the 32000 Case Guaranteed Jobs? Know the Latest Updates
Primary 32000 Case: The hearing of the 32,000 primary teacher recruitment case is proceeding with intense anticipation in the Calcutta High Court. The latest situation in this case, in the court of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty, has created new hope in the minds of the job aspirants. The biggest question that has arisen is, are the jobs of the petitioners in the 32,000 case really guaranteed? In this report, we will discuss the details of the case and its possible future in detail.
Current Status of the Case and the Judge’s Observation
Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty of the Calcutta High Court has made some important observations during the hearing of the 32,000 job cancellation case. He has said that if it is proven that no additional appointments have been made beyond the 32,000 vacancies and the existence of vacancies can be confirmed through RTI (Right to Information) reports, then the original petitioners should be appointed to those posts. This observation is a strong message in favor of the petitioners. It is clear from the judge’s attitude that he is more focused on ensuring the petitioners’ jobs rather than canceling the panel.
The Board’s Statement and the Petitioners’ Strategy
During the hearing of the case, the lawyer for the West Bengal Board of Primary Education stated that no additional appointments have been made beyond the 42,949. This statement is a great opportunity for the petitioners. The petitioners should now support this statement of the board and argue in their own favor. They must make it clear to the court through their lawyers that they do not want to cancel the entire panel, but rather want their jobs back. Adopting this strategy will make their claim stronger before the judges.
The Example of the 26,000 Job Cancellation and Its Lessons
Justice Chakraborty has cited the example of the 26,000 job cancellation case, where no party benefited from the cancellation of the panel and everyone suffered financial losses. He does not want the outcome of the 32,000 case to be the same. Learning from this example, the petitioners should move away from the demand for panel cancellation and focus on their jobs.
Conclusion: Advice for the Petitioners
Analyzing the latest situation of the case, it can be said that the chances of the petitioners getting jobs in the 32,000 case are much brighter than before. However, for this, they have to move forward with the right strategy. Their main goal should be to strongly present their claim for their jobs to the judge and to refrain from extreme measures like canceling the panel. If the petitioners can fight the legal battle together in the right way, then their chances of getting their jobs confirmed are high.
