Sensational Allegations in SSC XI-XII Interview List! Extra 10 Marks for Health Workers & Primary Teachers? New Case in High Court

SSC Interview List: A new case has been filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging the recently published interview or verification list for the SSC (School Service Commission) XI-XII level teacher recruitment. Since the list’s publication, allegations of various discrepancies have surfaced, which have now reached the court. The matter was mentioned before Justice Amrita Sinah’s bench, where several sensational claims were brought forward, surprising even the judge.

The petitioner’s counsel, Firdous Shamim, highlighted multiple anomalies in the list before the court. These allegations have caused significant concern among the job aspirants.

What are the Main Allegations in the Case?

According to the information presented in court, the interview list is riddled with several serious discrepancies. The key allegations are:

• Presence of ‘Tainted’ Candidates: It has been alleged that despite a clear order from the Supreme Court, the names of so-called ‘tainted’ candidates, accused of corruption, have been included in the list.
• Irregularity in Awarding Marks: Many candidates have allegedly been awarded an additional 10 marks for experience, even though they do not teach at the Higher Secondary level.
• Benefits to Candidates from Other Professions: The most surprising allegation is that primary school teachers and even Health Co-workers have been given this 10-mark benefit. The judge expressed astonishment upon hearing that a health worker received experience marks in a teacher recruitment process.
• Age-related Discrepancy: A question has also been raised about how a candidate with a date of birth in 1997 could receive 10 marks for experience, as their age does not align with the required period of professional experience.

What Has the Court Ordered?

Understanding the gravity of the matter, Justice Amrita Sinah has decided to hear all parties involved. Although the verification process is scheduled to begin tomorrow, the hearing for this case has been fixed for the 19th (Wednesday). The judge has directed that notices be issued to all relevant parties.

Should Job Aspirants be Worried?

While this new case has worried many candidates, legal experts suggest there is little reason to panic. The solution lies within the Supreme Court’s prior directives. According to the apex court’s ruling, if any ineligible or ‘tainted’ candidate mistakenly makes it to the list, they will be weeded out during the verification stage. The Commission prepared the list based on the information provided by the candidates in their applications. Therefore, during physical verification, those who fail to produce a-proof documents for their claims will be automatically disqualified. It is thus expected that this legal process will ensure only deserving candidates receive final appointment.