WBSSC Notification Case: Big Day in Calcutta High Court for SSC Case! Battle of Heavyweight Lawyers!

WBSSC Notification Case: A crucial hearing of an SSC case is set to take place today in Justice Sougata Bhattacharya’s courtroom (Court No. 18) at the Calcutta High Court, which is expected to bring a new turn to the case. Although the hearing was scheduled to begin at 10:30 AM, the main proceedings might start around 11:00 AM.

This case has created a lot of excitement among the job aspirants, and many are looking forward to the court’s verdict.

Background of the Case

This case had previously come up before Justice Sougata Bhattacharya. At that time, he did not want to intervene directly.

The court had stated that it would not interfere in the matter and had ordered the examination process to proceed. But today’s hearing is very important because several new issues may arise, and the presence of many heavyweight lawyers will be noticed.

Presence of Lawyers

Several prominent lawyers will be present in today’s hearing, which has further increased the importance of this case:

• Anindya Kumar Mitra: Former Advocate General of the state and a senior barrister.
• Subir Sanyal: An experienced lawyer for the West Bengal Board of Primary Education.
• Pratik Dhar: A senior lawyer for the Madrasah Service Commission.
• Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya: Known for his role in the case of cancellation of 26,000 jobs.

Issues to be Considered

Several important issues will be discussed in this hearing, based on which the court will give its verdict:

• Eligibility of “Tainted” Candidates: There is a big question as to whether the “tainted” or accused candidates will be able to sit for the exam.
• Condition of Marks: The issue of whether candidates who have scored 45% marks will get a chance to sit for the exam is also under consideration.
• Age Relaxation: Matters related to age relaxation will also be discussed in this hearing.

Possible Verdict

According to a section of the legal community, Justice Sougata Bhattacharya may not intervene in the matter of the “tainted” candidates appearing for the exam, which he had indicated earlier.

However, this hearing may result in some changes to the notification or create a new opportunity for the job aspirants. Now it remains to be seen what the court finally decides and which direction the future of this case takes.