Election Bike Rules: The Calcutta High Court has significantly modified the election-related bike rules, bringing much-needed relief to commuters and voters across West Bengal. On Friday, a bench led by Justice Krishna Rao struck down the Election Commission’s earlier directive that imposed a blanket ban on two-wheeler movement starting 48 hours before polling. The court clearly stated that authorities cannot justify broad, arbitrary restrictions on motorcycle usage in the name of ensuring free and fair elections.
While acknowledging the Election Commission’s duty to conduct peaceful polls, the court emphasized that such powers must operate strictly within the bounds of existing law. Justice Krishna Rao observed that there is no provision in the Representation of the People Act that supports an arbitrary prohibition on motorcycle commuting.
The updated guidelines for bike usage during the election are as follows:
- Motorcycle rallies are strictly prohibited from 48 hours before the polling day.
- Voters are permitted to use motorcycles to travel to polling stations between 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM on the day of the vote.
- Pillion riding is allowed for genuine needs, such as medical emergencies, family functions, or dropping/picking up children from schools and colleges.
- App-based bike services like Ola and Uber, along with online food delivery services, are exempt from these restrictions.
- Office-goers are allowed to commute on their bikes, provided they carry valid identification.
The court further noted that the presence of state police and central forces is sufficient to maintain order, making a blanket restriction on private vehicle movement unnecessary. This ruling provides a vital update for government employees and the general public, clarifying that while election-related rallies remain banned, essential daily commuting is protected by the court’s intervention.
Commuters are advised to carry valid government or office identity cards while traveling during this period to avoid any friction with security personnel. The decision effectively strikes a balance between preserving electoral integrity and upholding the fundamental right of citizens to move freely for their livelihoods and essential duties.
