New Case Over SSC Interview List! Is Increasing Vacancies the Only Solution? Know the Advocate’s Complete Analysis

SSC Interview List: Following the publication of the School Service Commission’s (SSC) preliminary interview list, widespread discussions and controversies have erupted across the state. While Freshers are protesting on the streets, In-service and Tainted teachers have also raised their voices with their own demands. Advocate Ali Ahasan Alamgir has shared his analysis of this complex legal situation.

The Core Controversy and Potential Solutions

One of the primary allegations from the protesting candidates is that many freshers with high scores were not called for the interview or verification process. This claim has not been denied; in fact, it has been acknowledged that such incidents have occurred in several subjects and categories.

According to Advocate Alamgir, if the interests of all parties are to be protected, increasing the number of vacancies (seats) could be a very viable option. He suggests that the government should consider this to create a balance among deserving candidates and reduce discontent.

Previous Legal Actions by ‘Tainted’ Teachers

The ‘Tainted’ teachers had previously filed a writ petition (WPA 13160 of 2025) in the Calcutta High Court. The main demands of that case were:

• To initiate a separate recruitment process with a significant number of vacancies for freshers.
• To conduct a separate process for the 2016 participants, excluding the tainted candidates.

However, both the High Court and the Supreme Court refrained from intervening at that time, stating that the process would continue as per the new rules.

The Supreme Court’s Directive and Deadline

As the case moved through various legal forums, a deadline set by the Supreme Court played a crucial role. The apex court had ordered the entire recruitment process to be completed by December 31st. This is why the courts were reluctant to take any step that could further delay the process. Notably, the service tenure of the irregular teachers was also valid only until December 31st.

The ‘Tainted’ Candidate Issue

Currently, a major allegation is that ‘tainted’ or accused candidates have also made it to the published list. According to the advocate, the list of tainted candidates was published under the direction of the Supreme Court (in the Bijoy Biswas case). Although this list was challenged, the appeals were dismissed by the Single Bench, Division Bench, and even the Supreme Court.

In the Rehana Begum case, the Supreme Court had clearly stated that if any tainted candidate “slips through” and gets called for verification, the Commission is obligated to stop them even at the appointment stage. The court had even requested lawyers to identify such tainted candidates and inform the Commission. Advocate Alamgir affirmed that if any such candidate comes to their notice, they will definitely challenge it, but he argued against halting the Supreme Court-monitored process through litigation.

Allegations Regarding Teaching Experience

Some complaints have also surfaced regarding teaching experience. On this matter, the SSC has always maintained that the experience must be in a Substantive Post. If a candidate has applied using incorrect information or experience from another job, it is not possible for the Commission to detect it at the preliminary stage. This will only be caught during verification, and such candidates will naturally be disqualified.

Final Statement: The Demand for More Vacancies

Advocate Ali Ahasan Alamgir reiterated that increasing vacancies is a burning issue and the government must consider it. He praised the current movement, especially since this recruitment is happening after a gap of 10 years. He hopes that the court will thwart any attempt that pushes the process towards a complete halt, similar to the ‘First SLST’. He also advocated for equal opportunities for freshers, acknowledging that while many are on the list, more deserving candidates should also get a chance.