WB Voter List: Major Case Filed in Supreme Court Alleging Logical Discrepancies in WB Voter List

WB Voter List: Significant legal complications have arisen regarding the Special Summary Revision (SSR) process of the voter list in West Bengal. A major case has been filed in the Supreme Court alleging procedural errors, arbitrary “logical discrepancies,” and the rejection of valid documents by the Election Commission. The lawsuit highlights the severe harassment faced not only by ordinary voters but also by Booth Level Officers (BLOs).

Key Allegations and Basis of the Case

The petition submitted to the Supreme Court raises several serious questions about the Election Commission’s software and operational procedures. According to the petitioners, millions of people in the state are facing difficulties due to certain directives and technical glitches.

• Logical Discrepancy: It is alleged that notices have been sent to approximately 1.36 crore voters citing “logical discrepancies” without any written order. For instance, cases where the age difference between a father and son is less than 15 years, or where multiple children (e.g., 6) are listed under one father, are automatically flagged as “inconsistencies,” leading to mandatory hearings.
• Software and Data Issues: Major technical errors occurred while converting the 2002 voter list hardcopies into digital (CSV) formats via scanning. As a result, the names of many voters appear in the hardcopy but are missing from the online portal.
• Rejection of Documents: There are allegations that valid documents, such as land deeds or post-2010 OBC certificates, are being arbitrarily rejected during hearings despite being produced by eligible voters.
• Deletion Without Notice: In many instances, names are reportedly being deleted from the voter list without any prior notice or opportunity for a hearing, violating the rights of ordinary citizens.

Demands Placed Before the Supreme Court

The petitioners have put forward several specific demands to the Supreme Court to facilitate the process for common citizens, especially the elderly:

1. Special Arrangements for the Elderly: Citizens over 60 years of age and those who are ill should be exempted from physical appearance. The petition demands doorstep verification or verification via video calls/telephone for them.
2. Virtual Hearings: For migrant voters or those staying outside the state for work, demands have been made to allow virtual hearings or representation through family members.
3. Recognition of Panchayat Documents: In rural areas, Residential Certificates issued by the Panchayat Pradhan and the Family Register should be accepted as valid proof of residence and identity.
4. Extension of Deadline & Stay on Publication: Although the deadline for filing claims and objections is set for January 15, 2026, a request has been made to extend this timeline considering the current chaos. Additionally, the petitioners have urged the court to stay the publication of the final voter list until proper verification and security are ensured.

Public Harassment and Next Steps

The issue of “logical discrepancy” has put immense pressure not just on voters but also on BLOs. Inconsistencies in the software and various instructions reportedly issued via WhatsApp have created confusion at the ground level. A Trinamool Congress MP has approached the apex court regarding these issues. Currently, all eyes are on the Supreme Court’s upcoming directives, which could have a significant impact on the state’s electoral process.