BLO App Update: Logical Discrepancy Causes Voter Hearing Notices, Check Solution and Required Documents

BLO App Update: The Election Commission’s BLO (Booth Level Officer) App has introduced a significant update that is impacting the voter list correction process. With the rollout of version 9.09, the issue of ‘Logical Discrepancy’ has taken center stage. Many registered voters are now receiving notices for hearings due to mismatches flagged by the system. Here is a detailed breakdown of why this is happening and the steps you need to take.

The New ‘White’ Flagging in BLO App

In the ‘Special Intensive Revision’ section of the BLO App, voter names were previously marked with green or white indicators based on their status. However, following the 9.09 update, many names are now appearing under the ‘White’ color code. This specifically targets voters whose names existed in the 2002 voter list or the last SIR (Special Intensive Revision) list but are now flagged for verification.

This flagging indicates that the system requires fresh documentation to validate the voter’s identity due to data mismatches.

Why are Hearing Notices Being Issued?

The core issue stems from a specific error message displayed in the app: “Your name in the last SIR does not match in the name in current elector roll.”

This essentially means that while the voter exists in both the 2002 (or last verified) list and the current list, the spelling or presentation of the name does not match exactly.

• Spelling and Translation Errors: A major cause for this discrepancy is often a mismatch in English spelling, potentially due to Google Translate errors or data entry mistakes made years ago, even if the name in the regional language (Bengali) is correct.
• Self-Verification Focus: Previously, discrepancies were often linked to mismatches in parental lineage. However, the current update focuses on the voter’s own name. Even if you are on the 2002 list, a spelling variation is enough to trigger a hearing notice.

Required Documents and Upload Process

Voters flagged under this new logical discrepancy must upload specific documents through their BLO. If you face this situation, ensure you have the following:

1. Proof of Previous List: You must provide the front page (Top Sheet) of the 2002 voter list along with the specific page where your name appears.
2. No Parental Docs Needed: Since the verification is based on your own name appearing in the old list, you do not need to upload documents belonging to your father or grandfather.
3. BLO Undertaking: A specific BLO undertaking form needs to be filled out, captured, and submitted via the app.

The Role of Affidavit in Hearings

When attending the hearing, being legally prepared is crucial, especially if the discrepancy involves a significant spelling mistake.

• First Class Magistrate Affidavit: If there is a noticeable difference between the spelling in the 2002 list and your current ID, it is highly recommended to get an affidavit sworn before a First Class Magistrate.
• Content of Affidavit: The legal document should clearly declare that the person named in the 2002 list and the person in the current voter list are one and the same, despite the spelling variation.

While data entry errors are technical glitches, the burden of proof lies with the voter. Carrying the correct old records and a valid affidavit will ensure your name remains active in the electoral roll without issues.